Personal tools

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
You are here: Home Newsroom Education News Roundup Archive 2010 August 2010 Grading teachers on value-added measures falls short

Grading teachers on value-added measures falls short

  • 08-25-2010
  • Bookmark and Share

Op-ed/UCLA Today Commentary by fifteen education scholars from UCLA, CSU Northridge, Stanford, Duke and the University of Wisconsin-Madison in response to the recent Los Angeles Times article, "Who's Teaching L.A.'s Kids?"

Research indicates that well-constructed VA estimates, especially those based on averages over at least three years, can provide valuable information about teachers’ contributions to student learning. Research also shows that teacher effectiveness varies considerably, even within schools. The public needs to know, however, that VA modeling is not an exact enough methodology to justify identifying individual teachers as “effective” or “ineffective” based solely on a particular VA score. The Times authors themselves cite a recent National Academy of Sciences report saying that value-added measures are promising but not ready for high stakes contexts. Providing a public database of teachers’ VA estimates constitutes a high stakes context both because it could affect teachers’ reputations in their school communities and because it could harm students’ educational outcomes if parents base decisions solely on this information. Thus, publishing such a database is scientifically premature. (more…)

Document Actions
Connect with IDEA
Subscribe to the news roundup

 

facebook-portlet

 

twitter-portlet

 

rss-portlet