Personal tools

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
You are here: Home Newsroom Education News Roundup Archive 2011 December 2011 What ‘multiple measures’ really means in evaluation

What ‘multiple measures’ really means in evaluation

  • 12-06-2011
  • Bookmark and Share

By Lisa Guisbond and Monty Neill/Washington Post

Like the same old laundry detergent with a “new and improved” sticker, sometimes the only real change in U.S. education policy is the language used to describe it. The federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law is badly tarnished. Even Education Secretary Arne Duncan is running away from it, offering waivers from NCLB’s demand for “adequate yearly progress” on state test scores. To get the waivers, states must propose how they will measure student progress. Some states, such as Minnesota and Colorado, have said they will use “multiple measures.” This would represent significant progress if state politicians were talking about the real thing. Real multiple measures use a variety of different ways to measure student learning over time. (more...)

 

 

Document Actions
Connect with IDEA
Subscribe to the news roundup

 

facebook-portlet

 

twitter-portlet

 

rss-portlet